Ελληνική γλώσσα άνευ διδασκάλου

Learn Greek, it is the language of the wisdom (Μάθε Ελληνικά, είναι η γλώσσα της σοφίας) George Bernard Shaw
«Ει οι θεοί διαλέγονται, τη των Ελλήνων γλώττη χρώνται». Κικέρων


ΟΜΙΛΕΙΤΕ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ; (OMILEITE HELLENICA?) DO YOU SPEAK GREEK? Is it all Greek to you? Are you sure you don΄t speak Greek? I Bet you do...fluently! Test your knowledge in Hellenic Language by reading texts below. No matter how much you try, you will not be able to find a single world which is of other than of Hellenic Origin, except for articles and prepositions.


Πολλές φορές γίνεται λόγος για την εισβολή των ξένων λέξεων και όρων στην ελληνική γλώσσα. Υπάρχει όμως και η άλλη πλευρά του λόφου. Πόσα άραγε μπορεί κανείς να πει στα αγγλικά χρησιμοποιώντας μόνο ελληνικές λέξεις;

Ο Καθηγητής και Ακαδημαϊκός Ξενοφών Ζολώτας, επιφανής Έλληνας οικονομολόγος, διατελέσας υπουργός και πρωθυπουργός, γεννήθηκε στην Αθήνα το 1904, απεβίωσε δε, πλήρης ημερών στα 2004. Ως Διοικητής της Τραπέζης της Ελλάδος και διαχειριστής του Ελληνικού Δημοσίου Χρέους συμμετείχε σε δύο Συνόδους της Διεθνούς Τράπεζας Ανασυγκρότησης και Ανάπτυξης (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development) στην Ουάσιγκτον και εκφώνησε δύο μνημειώδεις ομιλίες στα 1957 & 1959.

Ο λόγος που οι ομιλίες αυτές έχουν τόση αξία και μάλιστα διαχρονική, είναι ότι, ενώ απευθύνθηκε στο πολυπληθές ακροατήριό του στην Αγγλική Γλώσσα, στην ουσία, με την εξαίρεση λίγων άρθρων, προθέσεων και συνδέσμων, οι λέξεις που χρησιμοποίησε ήσαν όλες Ελληνικές. Έγινε απολύτως κατανοητός και καταχειροκροτήθηκε!

Ας δούμε πρώτα αυτές τις δύο ομιλίες του Ξ. Ζολώτα και ακολουθούν μία ομιλία στα Γαλλικά και δύο ακόμη ομιλίες στα Αγγλικά, με οικονομικά και ιατρικά θέματα.

September 26th, 1957

Remarks by the Hon. Xenophon Zolotas, Governor of the Bank of Greece and Governor of the Fund for Greece, at the closing Joint Sessions of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development International Monetary Fund.

I always wished to address this Assembly in Greek, but I realised that it would have been indeed Greek to all present in this room. I found out however, that I could make my address in Greek which would still be in English to everybody. With your permission, Mr Chairman, I shall do it now, using with the exception of articles and prepositions, only Greek words.

Kyrie!

I eulogise the archons of the Panethnic Numismatic Thesaurus and the Ecumenical Trapeza for the orthodoxy of their axioms methods and policies, although there is an episode of cacophony of the Trapeza with Hellas.

With enthusiasm we dialogue and synagonize at the synods of our didymous Organisations in which polymorphous economic ideas and dogmas are analysed and synthesised.

Our critical problems such as the numismatic plethora generate some agony and melancholy. This phenomenon is characteristic of our epoch. But, to my thesis, we have the dynamism to program therapeutic practices as a prophylaxis from chaos and catastrophe.

In parallel a panethnic un-hypocritical economic synergy and harmonisation in a democratic climate is basic.

I apologize for my eccentric monologue. I emphasise my eucharistia to you, Kyrie, to the eugenic and generous American Ethnos and to the organisers and protagonists of this Amphictyony and the gastronomic symposia.

26 Σεπτεμβρίου 1957

Σχόλια από τον Καθηγητή Ξενοφώντα Ζολώτα, Διοικητή της Τραπέζης της Ελλάδος & διαχειριστή του Ελληνικού Δημοσίου Χρέους, στην καταληκτήρια Συνεδρία της Συνόδου Διεθνούς Τράπεζας Ανασυγκρότησης και Ανάπτυξης.

Πάντοτε επιθυμούσα να απευθυνθώ σε αυτή την Συνέλευση στα Ελληνικά, αλλά αντιλαμβάνομαι ότι θα ήταν πράγματι «Ελληνικά» για τους παρευρισκομένους στην αίθουσα αυτή. Ανακάλυψα όμως ότι θα μπορούσα να απευθύνω ένα χαιρετισμό στα Ελληνικά τα οποία, εν τούτοις, θα ήταν Αγγλικά για όλους. Με την άδειά σας, κ. Πρόεδρε, θα το κάνω τώρα χρησιμοποιώντας, με εξαίρεση τα άρθρα και τις προθέσεις, μόνον Ελληνικές λέξεις.

Κύριοι,

Ευλογώ τους άρχοντες του ∆ιεθνούς Νομισματικού Ταμείου και της Οικουμενικής Τραπέζης για την ορθοδοξία των αξιωμάτων τους, των μεθόδων και της πολιτικής, μολονότι υπάρχει ένα επεισόδιο κακοφωνίας της Τραπέζης με την Ελλάδα.

Με ενθουσιασμό διαλογιζόμεθα και συναγωνιζόμεθα εις τις Συνόδους των διδύμων Οργανισμών, εις τις οποίες πολύμορφες οικονομικές ιδέες και δόγματα αναλύονται και συνθέτονται.

Τα κρίσιμα προβλήματά μας, όπως ο νομισματικός πληθωρισμός γεννούν κάποια αγωνία και μελαγχολία. Αυτό το φαινόμενο είναι χαρακτηριστικό της εποχής μας. Αλλά, κατά την άποψή μου, έχουμε τον δυναμισμό να προγραμματίσουμε θεραπευτικές πρακτικές, ως μία προφύλαξη από το χάος και την καταστροφή.

Παράλληλα, μία πανεθνική ανυπόκριτη οικονομική συνεργασία και εναρμόνιση μέσα σε ένα δημοκρατικό κλίμα είναι βασική.

Απολογούμαι για τον εκκεντρικό μου μονόλογο. Εκφράζω με έμφαση τις ευχαριστίες μου προς εσάς, Κύριοι, προς το ευγενικό και γενναιόδωρο Αμερικανικό Έθνος και προς τους οργανωτές και τους πρωταγωνιστές αυτής της Αμφικτυονίας και των γαστρονομικών συμποσίων.

October 2, 1959

Two years later in 1959 Professor Zolotas gave another Hellenic American speech, saying that he asked them to listen intently even with the possible danger of tiring his listeners. Here is the speech:

Kyrie!

It is Zeus΄ anathema on our epoch for the dynamism of our economies and the heresy of our economic methods and policies that we should agonize between the Scylla of numismatic plethora and the Charybdis of economic anaemia.

It is not in my idiosyncrasy to be ironic and sarcastic but my diagnosis would be that politicians are rather crypto-plethorists. Although they emphatically stigmatize numismatic plethora, they energize it through their tactics and practices.

Our policies should be based more on economic and less on political criteria. Our gnomon has to be metron between economic, strategic and philanthropic scopes. Political magic has always been anti-economic.

In an epoch characterized by monopolies, oligopolies, monopsonies, monopolistic antagonism and polymorphous inelasticities, our policies have to be more orthological. But this should not be metamorphosed into plethorophobia which is endemic among academic economists.

Numismatic symmetry should not hyper-antagonize economic acme.

A greater antagonisation between the practices of the economic and numismatic archons is basic.

Parallel to this, we have to synchronize and harmonize more and more our economic and numismatic policies panethnically.

These scopes are more practicable now, when the prognostics of the political and economical barometer are halcyonic.

The history of our didymous Organizations in this sphere has been didactic and their gnostic practices will always be a tonic to the polyonymous and idiomorphous ethnical economies. The genesis of the programmed organization will dynamitise these polities. Therefore, I sympathize, although not without criticism on one or two themes, with the apostles and the hierarchy of our organizations in their zeal to program orthodox economic and numismatic polities.

I apologise for having tyrannised you with my Hellenic phraseology.

In my epilogue, I emphasise my eulogy to the philoxenous autochthons of this cosmopolitan metropolis and my encomium to you, Kyrie, and the stenographers.

2 Οκτωβρίου 1959

Δύο έτη αργότερα, το 1959, ο Ξ. Ζολώτας έδωσε μία άλλη ελληνοαγγλική ομιλία, ζητώντας να τον ακούσουν με προσοχή, ακόμα κ’αν υπήρχε ο κίνδυνος να κουράσει τους ακροατές του. Ιδού ο λόγος σε ελληνική «μεταγραφή":

Κύριοι,

Είναι «Διός ανάθεμα» στην εποχή μας και αίρεση της οικονομικής μας μεθόδου και της οικονομικής μας πολιτικής το ότι θα φέρναμε σε αγωνία την Σκύλλα του νομισματικού πληθωρισμού και τη Χάρυβδη της οικονομικής μας αναιμίας.

Δεν είναι στην ιδιοσυγκρασία μου να είμαι ειρωνικός ή σαρκαστικός αλλά η διάγνωσή μου θα ήταν ότι οι πολιτικοί είναι μάλλον κρυπτοπληθωριστές. Αν και με έμφαση στιγματίζουν τον νομισματικό πληθωρισμό, τον ενεργοποιούν μέσω της τακτικής τους και των πρακτικών τους.

Η πολιτική μας θα έπρεπε να βασίζεται περισσότερο σε οικονομικά και λιγότερο σε πολιτικά κριτήρια. Γνώμων μας πρέπει να είναι ένα μέτρο μεταξύ οικονομικής, στρατηγικής και φιλανθρωπικής σκοπιάς.

Σε μια εποχή που χαρακτηρίζεται από μονοπώλια, ολιγοπώλια, μονοπωλιακό ανταγωνισμό και πολύμορφες ανελαστικότητες, οι πολιτικές μας πρέπει να είναι πιο ορθολογιστικές, αλλά αυτό δεν θα έπρεπε να μεταμορφώνεται σε πληθωροφοβία, η οποία είναι ενδημική στους ακαδημαϊκούς οικονομολόγους.

Η νομισματική συμμετρία δεν θα έπρεπε να ανταγωνίζεται την οικονομική ακμή.

Μια μεγαλύτερη εναρμόνιση μεταξύ των πρακτικών των οικονομικών και νομισματικών αρχόντων είναι βασική.

Παράλληλα με αυτό, πρέπει να εκσυγχρονίσουμε και να εναρμονίσουμε όλο και περισσότερο τις οικονομικές και νομισματικές μας πρακτικές πανεθνικώς.

Αυτές οι θεωρήσεις είναι πιο εφαρμόσιμες τώρα, που τα προγνωστικά του πολιτικού και οικονομικού βαρομέτρου είναι χάλκινα.

Η ιστορία της δίδυμης οργάνωσης σε αυτήν την σφαίρα είναι διδακτική και οι γνωστικές τους εφαρμογές θα είναι πάντα ένα τονωτικό στις πολυώνυμες και ιδιόμορφες εθνικές οικονομίες. Η γένεση μιας προγραμματισμένης οργάνωσης θα ενισχύσει αυτές τις πολιτικές. Γι΄ αυτόν το λόγο αντιμετωπίζω με συμπάθεια, αλλά όχι χωρίς κριτική διάθεση, ένα ή δύο θέματα με τους αποστόλους της ιεραρχίας των οργάνων μας στον ζήλο τους να προγραμματίσουν ορθόδοξες οικονομικές και νομισματικές πολιτικές.

Απολογούμαι που σας τυράννησα με την ελληνική μου φρασεολογία.

Στον επίλογό μου δίνω έμφαση στην ευλογία μου, προς τους φιλόξενους αυτόχθονες αυτής της κοσμοπολίτικης μητρόπολης καθώς και το εγκώμιό μου προς εσάς, κύριοι στενογράφοι.

.

Le Dédale Synchrone Du Cosmos Politique

Kyrie,

Sans apostropher ma rhétorique dans l’emphase et la pléthore, j’analyserai elliptiquement, sans nul gallicisme, le dédale synchrone du cosmos politique caractérise par des syndromes de crise paralysant l’organisation systématique de notre économie. Nous sommes périodiquement sceptiques et neurasthéniques devant ces paroxysmes periphrasiques, cette boulimie des démagogues, ces hyperboles, ces paradoxes hypocrites et cyniques qui symbolisent une democratie anachronique et chaotique. Les phénomènes fantastiques qu’on nous prophétise pour l’ époque astronomique détrôneront les programmes rachitiques, hybrides et sporadiques de notre cycle atomique. Seule une panacée authentique et draconienne métamorphosera cette agonie prodrome de l’ apocalypse et une genèse homologue du Phénix. Les économistes technocrates seront les stratèges d’ un théâtre polémique et dynamique et non les prosélytes du marasme. Autochtones helléniques, dans une apologie cathartique, psalmodions les théorèmes de la démocratie thésaurisant et héroïque, soyons allergiques aux parasites allogènes dont les sophismes trop hyalins n’ont qu’une pseudo dialectique. En épilogue a ces agapes, mon amphore a l’ apogée, je prophétise toute euphorie et apothéose a Monsieur Giscard d’ Estaing, prototype enthousiasmant de la neo-orthodoxie économique et symbole de la palingénésie de son ethnie gallique.

.

Γαλλική ομιλία

2001.

Ολοκληρώθηκαν στη Ρόδο οι εργασίες του 5ου Ευρωπαϊκού Συνεδρίου Ορθοπεδικής, στο οποίο πήραν μέρος Έλληνες και Ευρωπαίοι ορθοπεδικοί. Κατά τη διάρκεια του συνεδρίου έγιναν σημαντικές ανακοινώσεις για τον τομέα της ορθοπεδικής. Ωστόσο, ιδιαίτερη αίσθηση στους συνέδρους προκάλεσε η ομιλία του καθηγητή Ορθοπεδικής στο Πανεπιστήμιο των Ιωαννίνων κ. Παναγιώτη Σουκάκου, ο οποίος απευθύνθηκε στο ακροατήριό του μιλώντας μεν αγγλικά, χρησιμοποιώντας όμως λέξεις που προέρχονται από την ελληνική γλώσσα. Με αυτή την ομιλία ο κ. Σουκάκος υποδέχθηκε τους συνέδρους και παράλληλα έδωσε το στίγμα του συνεδρίου επισημαίνοντας τα επιμέρους θέματα που αναπτύχθηκαν κατά τις εργασίες.

Έτσι, ο κ. Σουκάκος είπε:

"The Hellenic Orthopaedic physicians, have synchronized their dynamism and energy with the European Organization of Orthopaedics and Τraumatology, to generate this symbiotic and not ephemeral synthesis of charismatic, academic scholars, and are enthusiastic with the atmosphere of euphoria and analogous ecstasy in Dodecanese, Rodos.

Rhodes is a graphic Hellenic metropolitan centre in the Aegean archipelagos, with myriads of archaeological and historical sites. Rhodes is a geographical paradise of cryptic and chimerical icons of idyllic charm, amalgamated with Hellenic gastronomy of moussaka, souvlaki, ouzo emporia and euphoria of the rhyme and rhythm of bouzouki, Byzantine and Spanoudakis music.

Α plethora of basic and didactic themes in the sphere of orthopaedics and traumatology, such as trauma of the musculoskeletal system, arthroscopic and arthroplasty surgery, paediatric orthopaedics, poly-trauma, podiatric surgery, carpus and dactylic surgery with traumatic and genetic anomalies, microsurgery, spondylopathies like scoliosis, kyphosis and spondylolithesis, osteoporosis and pharmacologic and prophylactic therapeutic policies will be emphasized.

Diagnostic methods and etiological therapy of traumatic, non-physiological and pathological syndromes, therapeutic schemes and strategies, will be analyzed and synthesized at this academic symposium on the basis of a democratic climate and with the scope of a non-dogmatic and egocentric dialogue, which Ι prophesize will be an historic phenomenon and paradigm of dynamic synergy and harmony between polyethnic orthopaedic physicians of the European Epirus.

To paraphrase, with the phobia and dilemma of being tautological, let me emphasize that the logistics and machinations in this academic symposium, will generate the scheme and type of our harmonic synergy and syndesmosis.

Pragmatically, it is my thesis and not hypothesis that the next phase and programmed orthopaedic symposium in Helsinki which Ι eulogize will be as dynamic and with colossal kyros, as in Rhodes, Hellas.

Ι apologize for my eulogistic demagogy and if my etymological glossary is based on philosophic or symbolic metaphors and lexical hyperbole, please sympathize with me and Ι apologize for the idiosyncrasy of a zealous Hellenic, practising orthopaedic physician who is also fanatically enthusiastic about the giant anode of European propaedutics and academics in orthopaedics and traumatology».

2001.

March 15, 2000

Dr. John N. Kalaras, founder of Ariston University, Hotel Titania

Prologue

The scope of my lecture is to generate a dynamic dialogue on organizational and economic systems and techniques. Basically, my methodology is characterized by dialogue, a systematic phenomenon with every academician or epistemologist.

I will systematically analyze the idiosyncrasies and the characteristics of the organizational systems practiced today.

The architecture of my analysis-strategy, is systematic and pragmatic, yet paradoxically is characterized by enthusiasm and synchronization between theory and practice. The harmonic synergy of mathematical models and statistical techniques, has generated theorems and axioms practiced in capitalistic economic systems. My philosophy is logical, ethical and practical and has erected organizational models that have generated economic euphoria.

The magic aesthetics of my tactic is the plethora of Hellenic terminology in my phraseology.

The genesis of tragic economic problems generated in an economy are not symptomatic, in fact they are cyclical and periodic phenomena.

Such phenomena stigmatize and traumatize the economic euphoria of the agora.

Economic systems basically symbolize the philosophy and ideology of the governing political party.

The chronic and pathetic egomania and megalomania of certain governors, monarchs or tyrants, their apathy for philanthropy, their enigmatic and problematic logic, generated gigantic economic crises, which stigmatized and traumatized their political career. Such practices generate phobia, panic and periodically paralysis of the socioeconomic system.

The agora, during the archaic periods, was characterized as the physical parameters where philosophers, scholars, economists and epistemologists analyzed the problems generated by the political system.

The basic methodology was dialogue or rhetoric.

Dialogue, in a diametric antithesis with the monologue, has magic, it is characterized by synthesis and analysis and a plethora of other lectic schemes.

15 Μαρτίου 2000

Nikos Tatsos, Βῆμα 12.10.2011

I eulogize this polyglot and plethoric synod of diplomats, politicians, academics, economists, ecologists, mathematicians, econometricians, demographers, technologists and other scholars and technocrats who are systematically and dynamically analyzing the economic, numismatic, ecological and energy phenomena, problems, episodes and arrhythmias of this planet and agonize for the anamorphosis of our economic and ecological systems.

I emphasize in my prologue that I have no psychosis, rhetoric syndrome for demagogy or the scope to proselytize you with my homily to the Hellenic glossary. However, there is no amphibole that the Hellenic glossary is diachronic and ecumenical and that it has for eons stigmatized with its idiomorphic character and its plethora of lexis the history and the epistemology of this cosmos. It is neither a hypothesis nor hyperbolic to homologate that the synchronous polyglotism, its grammar and polymorphous dialects are based on lexis, synonyms, acronyms, symbols, metaphors, phraseology and glossary idioms and syntactic canons of the Hellenic glossa, its etymological thesaurus, its alphabet and its polytonic orthography. Thus, it is neither anacoluthon nor eccentric that the holon of my homily in this synod is in Hellenic . Though in such a trope that will still echo English to you. I Our epoch is characterized and stigmatized by the anarchy, anomaly, arrhythmia and atony of our asthenic economic system. However, all critical endogenous and exogenous parameters of the synthetic ecumenical economic architecture have been analyzed empirically and in bathos by our epistemologists and the anatomy of the episode and its etiology are not anymore agnostic, amphibological or anapodeictic. For, in our democratic systems there is no adytum and our icon for the genesis of the crisis has been well schematized now.

To my thesis, the genesis of the economic crisis is not symptomatic. Furthermore, to my thesis the critical parameters of this genesis are basically ethical.

Synoptically, I have the aesthesis that our adiaphanous economic systems characterized by monopolies, oligopolies, monopsonies and a plethora of other inelasticities and asymmetries, basically symbolize the philosophy of our plutocratic system and the ideology and idiosyncrasy of some of its strategic protagonists whose apathy, enigmatic and problematic logic, pathetic praxis and policies have no euesthesia for the ecumenical euphoria. Their economic axioms and methods and basically their economic bulimia have been catastrophic and chaotic.

I emphasize my agony and melancholy for them for not analyzing the episodes, the periodicity and the didactics of the phenomena. Their egoism and apathy have stigmatized our epoch, they have traumatized the democratic climate and their unorthodox policies have generated a hemorrhage of our economic systems.

Their chronic egomania and megalomania and their enigmatic and problematic logic is a pathetic phenomenon. They have no idealism, their dogmas and practices are often asymmetric and in antithesis to the pneuma and the axioms of our epoch and their egoism and apathy for the ecumenical euphoria generates phobia and panic.

Though, it is not my scope to be hyper-categorical or to hyper-dramatize the phenomenon and it is not to my ethos and idiosyncrasy to anathematize the protagonists of the economic pandemonium either. In our democratic political systems there is always an exodus from the chaos and the crisis.

It is crystal that the economic crisis is not yet epic and that for the anacrusis of the crisis, the catharsis and metamorphosis of the economic system and the anabiosis of the economic euphoria drastic (even draconian, but not barbaric) praxes are still basic. But, they must be logical and pragmatic and our gnomon has to be a synthesis of political, economic and ecological scopes, together with philanthropic criteria. Hence, it is critical to emphasize that those prognosis techniques, diagnosis and therapeutic methodologies that are based on econometric models and other mathematical techniques are not a panacea for the anomalies of our epoch.

The scope of our policy must be to organize a dynamic dialogue on the therapy of the economic system and not parallel monologues with stereotypes. For, with synergies, academic gnosis, epistemological methods and dialogue we can analyze and synthesize the plethora of economic ideas and dogmas. Though, our policies must be based more on economic and less on political criteria. And our strategies and policies should not be antagonistic, anachronistic, myopic or atrophic. They must be harmonized and symmetric, systematic, well organized and synchronized. And they must be based on the orthodoxy of economic theory, epistemological axioms and analysis.

Basically, I prophesize that this odyssey, this traumatic historic phenomenon will be a paradigm of harmony and dynamic synergy between our Organization, the Pan-ethnic Numismatic Thesaurus (IMF), the European Enosis (EU) and all other pan-ethnic or peripheral organizations. I I It is also critical to emphasize that economic policy must not be hyper-antagonistic to ecological acme. For, to my thesis, the dilemma “economic euphoria or ecological acme” is a pseudo-dilemma. In antithesis, a greater harmonization between economic and ecological policies and practices is basic.

The ecological catastrophe is not a symptomatic phenomenon and my prognosis is that it is not an epidermic or ephemeral phenomenon either. It is a pandemic episode and an endemic phenomenon of our axiomatic system. It is also a drama, a trauma, an anathema and a stigma of our epoch.

In parenthesis, I homologate that I am dysthymic with all those egocentric and myopic politicians, technocrats, economic colossus or economic oligarchs who with their apathy, frenetic praxis, hysteric and psychotic syndromes and ephemeral policies base their plutocracy and monocracy on unethical, non-deontological and asymmetric practices with myriads of problems. We are all martyrs of their adiaphorism and economic bulimia and paradoxically, I have the aesthesis that it is only those protagonists that do not panic with their egoism and aphasia.

New ideas, new methods, new technologies and new techniques for new ecological and biological systems are basic and drastic therapeutical practices without hysteresis are critical to pause the problem. New empirical methods and new holistic and horizontal analyses are also basic as an antidote to the phenomenon.

There is no amphibole that we have the gnosis, the enthusiasm and the dynamism to program therapeutic practices for the economic anemia and the ecological chaos and catastrophe. But there is no magic, automatic or anodynous exodus from the crisis. Diagnostic methods, therapeutic schemes and strategies must be analyzed and synthesized based on a democratic climate and non-dogmatic or egocentric dialogue. For, the dialogue being in diametric antithesis with the monologue is characterized by the synthesis of ideas and its democratic pneuma and axioms. Though, our prognostic, diagnostic and therapeutic practices must be logical and pragmatic and in harmony with our dogmas and ideas.

We must generate and organize new techniques, new technologies and new ideas as a therapy to the climatic anomalies of the planet, without stereotypes or geopolitical antagonism. Thus, while chemicals, petroleum and the plethora of other non ecological morphs of energy are catastrophic, agro-ecological methods, photoelectric, hydraulic, hydro-electric and other ecological and biological types and categories of energy that are still in practice in embryonic morph are central as antidotes and will diachronically metamorphose the physiognomy, physiology and morphology of our ecumenical clima.

In my epilogue, I apologize for having tyrannized you with my monologue and sympathize me for my Hellenic acrobatic phraseology and etymological glossary that was based on lexical hyperboles, synonyms and symbolic metaphors. My apologies also for my cynical, caustic and anaglyph tone about the chaos of the economic crisis and the polymorph episodes of the ecological catastrophe.

I emphasize my euharistia to all of you, diplomats and scholars, to the plethora of technocrats and analysts, to the technicians, the organizers, and generally to all eponymous and anonymous protagonists of these synods. All our synods have generated schemes of synergies and they have been isometrically dynamic, with all of us agonizing with zeal for the anamorphosis of the economic system and the metamorphosis of the climate of this planet.

I am also enthusiastic with the atmosphere of our synods and the euphoria of gnosis and praxis under the aegis of our Organization. And although it is not my scope to propagandize for our Organization, I emphasize that I am fanatically enthusiastic about its colossal and prototype analyses, its epistemological bibles and periodicals and generally its bibliographic thesaurus. In parallel, I am enthusiastic about its gigantic anode and acme. This Organization of homogenous ethnos is, as a catalyst of synergies and empirical analysis, pragmatically monadic. However, it will be hypocritical not to homologate some skepticism about the prosthesis or proselytism of other ethnos to the OECD.

My euharistia to the Hellenic Politeia and to the eugenic, philoxenous autochthons of this cosmopolitan metropolis. I shall be nostalgic of the fantastic and phantasmagoric panorama of this polis, its physical thesaurus, the atmosphere of its cosmopolitan centre and generally its aura. Paris is pragmatically an ideal polis. A geographical paradise. An idyllic, plethoric, graphic, polyphyletic and non- xenophobic metropolis. A cosmopolitan centre with myriads of museums, palaces of aristocrats, theatres, operas, athletic centers and stadiums and plethora of other historical and panoramic scenes. I homologate that I am a fanatic Francophile, though still not as much a fanatic francophone. I shall also be nostalgic of our oenophile gastronomic symposia.

My encomiums to the charismatic hegemony of this Organization, you Angel for your pathos, dynamism, rhetoric charisma, fantasy, gigantic energy, stochastic analysis and scholastic zeal. All these charisma, together with your titanic physical and pneumatic enthusiasm have dynamized OECD and have metamorphosed the physiognomy of this Organization. All these charisma emphatically characterize you as an agonistes and patriarch of this Organization.

My eulogy and agape to all of you and... to phrase something in prototype and authentic English, «I’ll miss you all !».

Prof. Nikos Tatsos, Ambassador of Greece

ARTICLE in ENGLISH DEDICATED to the GREEK LANGUAGE
"Published in a British Art magazine"

The genesis of classical drama was not symptomatic. Aneuphoria of charismatic and talented protagonists showed fantastic scenes of historic episodes. The prologue, the theme and the epilogue, comprised the trilogy of drama while synthesis, analysis and synopsis characterized the phraseology of the text. The syntax and phraseology used by scholars, academicians and philosophers in their rhetoric, had many grammatical idioms and idiosyncrasies.

The protagonists periodically used pseudonyms. Anonymity was a syndrome that characterized the theatrical atmosphere.

Panoramic fantasy, mystique, melody, aesthetics, use of the cosmetic epithets are characteristics of drama.

Even through the theatres were physically gigantic, there was no need for microphones because the architecture and the acoustics would echo isometrically and crystal - clear. Many epistemologists of physics, aerodynamics, acoustics, electronics, electromagnetics can not analyze - explain the ideal and isometric acoustics of Hellenic theatres even today.

There were many categories of drama: classical drama, melodrama, satiric, epic, comedy, etc. The syndrome of xenophobia or dyslexia was overcome by the pathos of the actors who practiced methodically and emphatically. Acrobatics were also euphoric. There was a plethora of anecdotal themes, with which the acrobats would electrify the ecstatic audience with scenes from mythical and historical episodes.

Some theatric episodes were characterized as scandalous and blasphemous. Pornography, bigamy, haemophilia, nymphomania, polyandry, polygamy and heterosexuality were dramatized in a pedagogical way so the mysticism about them would not cause phobia or anathema or taken as anomaly but through logic, dialogue and analysis scepticism and the pathetic or cryptic mystery behind them would be dispelled.

It is historically and chronologically proven that theatre emphasized pedagogy, idealism and harmony. Paradoxically it also energized patriotism a phenomenon that symbolized ethnically character and phenomenal heroism.

Fair enough! You speak Greek. Just learn the prepositions and articles and you can make yourself perfectly understood. Otherwise, it seems you need to refresh your vocabulary in English.

Τα μικρά αυτά δείγματα γραφής σε συνδυασμό με τον «Θησαυρό της ελληνικής γλώσσας» της Μαριάνας Μακντόναλτ και το βραβευμένο από την Ακαδημία Αθηνών λεξικό του Αριστείδη Κωνσταντινίδη «οι ελληνικές λέξεις στην αγγλική γλώσσα», που ούτε λίγο ούτε πολύ είναι κάπου 30000, αποστομώνουν κάθε κακόβουλο δύσπιστο και πείθουν κάθε σκεπτόμενο άνθρωπο για την μοναδική διαχρονική προσφορά της μητέρας γλώσσας των γλωσσών.

Για τις ελληνικές λέξεις στη Γαλλική γλώσσα, ο αναγνώστης παραπέμπεται στο βιβλιαράκι των Jean Bouffartigue και Anne Marie Delrieu «Οι ελληνικές ρίζες στη γαλλική γλώσσα». Ιδού μία φράση από τον πρόλογο του βιβλίου τους. «Μακρινή πηγή του πολιτισμού μας, η Ελλάδα βρίσκεται ζωντανή μέσα στις λέξεις που λέμε. Σχηματίζει κάθε μέρα τη γλώσσα μας».


Επιστροφή / Back